My car was just in for it's 2nd oil service and I asked for the inspection service and pollen filter (years old now) to be carried out at the same time so I don't need to go back so often.
I was very surprised that they advised that the rear brake pads were 70% worn and the disk's need replacing, the fronts pads are 60% worn and no disks needed.
Puzzled that the rears have worn before the fronts especially that the disks need replacing also. I have thought that I could hear a slight rubbing of brakes when driving down a road with walls either side but just put it down to the fact I had used the brakes to slow down to drive down the road as it has speed bumps.
Does this seem right? Rears wearing before fronts, so soon? If it was fronts and I had been diving on the them hard all the time then yes I could accept that.... my s3 needed fronts after 38k previously.
I was very surprised that they advised that the rear brake pads were 70% worn and the disk's need replacing, the fronts pads are 60% worn and no disks needed.
Puzzled that the rears have worn before the fronts especially that the disks need replacing also. I have thought that I could hear a slight rubbing of brakes when driving down a road with walls either side but just put it down to the fact I had used the brakes to slow down to drive down the road as it has speed bumps.
Does this seem right? Rears wearing before fronts, so soon? If it was fronts and I had been diving on the them hard all the time then yes I could accept that.... my s3 needed fronts after 38k previously.