I agree with you about a forum not being biased, but you've said yourself that your posts will be biased towards TTS Roadsport.
I can't fault you for doing it, the cash is better in your pocket than theirs, but it means that people are going to be reading what they think are impartial posts when they clearly are anything but. That's the only reason he has a problem with TTS. If they refuse to offer any support just by signing up and answering people's questions and generally being helpful, but still want to use the forum for publicity through the back door, I can see his point.
err, dig that post out then!! I am not biased towards any of the companys, TTS did a great job for me on the RS4 brakes, revo did a great job on my re-map, QsT did a great job on my first mod's.
As for publicity though the back door it was MY decision to finally do a build thread like Jonny's and I get no cash or support from TTS, a site that has a strap line
Run by its members for its members, then when I post about my car and he dosent like it bans me, does not deserve to be a forum, and I am now looking at how to shut such biased sites down.
My posts are always about the work done AND who by, not always the same company by the way, Qst, Regal, revo, TTS & the Phirm were all mentioned how is that biased??
Your a moderator on that forum, you should have moderated!!
By the way the magazine article would have been biased towards S3-talk, but equal to everyone else, now S3-talk can SUCK MY D**K