pheonixv6quattro said:
How many soldiers do you know? You probably couldnt count them on one hand, no half a hand. Stop pretending you know what the crack is because you don't. Just because one of your"family members"(why the secrecy,its no big deal just say your bro or your cousin etc, he's in the army not 22!!!)is in the army.
Who are you to presume who or what I do and don't know, you know nothing about me so do not assume to do so. I could make wild assumptions about you too, but I don't because I don't know you. I happen to know enough people who are or have been in the armed services (there are more members of my family that have also served, not just the one). I also know plenty of soldiers both socially and people I grew up with who are now serving.
Also, of my family member, you have absolutely no idea what he has done during his career or with whom he has served. I, on the other hand do, so the level of details I choose to give is my choice and
absolutely none of your business!
pheonixv6quattro said:
The game you very rudely made me aware of was made in the 90's. Bods were not getting shot to bits and blown up when that game was released.
Besides the 38 British military personel killed in the Gulf War, I'm sure the families of Stephen Beacham, Stephen Burrows, Vincent Scott, Cyril Smith, David Sweeney, Paul Worrall, Michael Beswick, Stephen Restorick, Lawrence Dickson, Michael Newman, Charles Chapman, Andrew Grundy, Terence ONeill, Graham Stewart, David Wilson, R Coulson, Robert Davies, Michael Dillon-Lee, Anthony Harrison, John Randall, Peter Sullivan, John McMaster, Kevin Pullin, Damian Shackleton, Paul Turner, Simon Ware, Philip Cross, Daniel Blinco and Paul Garrett, would beg to differ with you on that one! For someone in the military you should really check your military history!
If you'd get off your high horse for a moment you will realise that I apologised for using the term "Cannon Fodder" but I think that nearly 200 years after the term was first coined its meaning has changed over the years...
Wikipedia said:
Cannon fodder is an informal term for military personnel who are regarded or treated as expendable in the face of enemy fire. The term is generally used in situations where soldiers are forced to deliberately fight against hopeless odds (with the foreknowledge that they will suffer extremely high casualties) in an effort to achieve a strategic goal. An example is the trench warfare in World War I. The term may also be used (somewhat pejoratively) to differentiate infantry from other forces (such as artillery, air force or the navy), who generally have a much higher survival rate.
As such no soldier that
I personally know has ever been offended by it and anyway, I would probably not call anybody I do not know well enough it either. It was merely used a term to refer to differentiate between two different "classes" of soldier, perhaps I should have used Crap Hat Vs Para instead? No offence was intended to an particular individual. I think that by now if a soldier found it soooooooo offensive 1 person of the British Army rosta of 131,100 people would have changed that outrageous statement on Wikipedia!
Anyways, can we drop this now? I think the post by Pat should put this way off-topic disagreement into perspective...
"Bombs don't discriminate"
Well said Pat.