Which tyres?

morgan306

Registered User
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
142
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Manston,Kent.
Sorry guys, I have tried searching but it's a minefield out there!

I need 2 new front tyres for my 8L s3,currently running Potenzas.

What do people rate?I don't have an endless pit of money as I've just got my first mortgage,but on the other hand I appreciate tyres are the things keeping me on the road!

Thanks for your help

Morgan
 
Well ive come from running michelin pilot sports to kumho ecsta's and i love them, the kumhos cost less than what 2 michelin tyres would have cost.
 
i have toyo proxes on mine at the moment and they are rubish in the wet,
will be going back to eagle f1s when i need to replace them.
 
Well ive come from running michelin pilot sports to kumho ecsta's and i love them, the kumhos cost less than what 2 michelin tyres would have cost.

Michelin car tyres have been shown to lead the way in environmental performance by offering longer life and reduced fuel consumption compared to their main European competitors, whilst maintaining the highest levels of safety on wet roads.

Two independent testing organisations, DEKRA and TÜV SÜD, conducted tests on Michelin’s 175/65 R 14T Energy Saver and 225/40 R 18Y Pilot Sport 3 car tyres and in each of these categories the Michelin tyres were up against their main European competitors from Bridgestone, Continental, Dunlop, Goodyear and Pirelli.

The results show that in each tyre category, Michelin came out on top by offering the best performance in terms of tyre life, rolling resistance and wet braking. As an example, compared to the average of the competitors’ results, the Michelin Energy Saver tyres offered around 19% longer tyre life, 17% better rolling resistance and a 7% improvement in wet braking performance. The Pilot Sport 3 was around 22%, 11% and 11% better than the average of the competitors, respectively (see separate sheets for results).

The tyre life tests were done by DEKRA and the rolling resistance and wet braking tests were done by TÜV SÜD. All tyres were bought from European tyre dealers to ensure they were exactly the same specification as those available to consumers on the replacement market.

The tyre life tests were carried out over 7,000 to 10,000 kms using two fleets of identical cars: Peugeot 206 plus for the 175/65 R 14s and VW Golf V for the 225/40 R 18s. Driving in four-car convoys, the tyres were switched between the cars and the cars’ position in the convoys was rotated to ensure the usage of all tyres was the same. Drivers were also switched between cars to ensure outside influences were reduced to the absolute minimum.

The rolling resistance tests were done using a rolling drum machine, which is approved by the European Commission, and in accordance with the latest ISO28580 specifications.

Taking into account longevity, fuel economy and safety, motorists can be sure that Michelin is still in pole position and leading its premium competitors in today’s highly competitive car tyre market.



The Kumho wouldnt even be in the same league as Bridgestone, Continental, Dunlop, Goodyear and Pirelli so i'd imagine the wear rate and wet weather braking could only be worse again.
 
whatever you do dont get those energy savers, gf has them on the focus estate and they brake away in corners in the wet, seriously rubbish grip fast round corners.
 
goodyear eagle f1 assemetrics are really good in my opinion.
 
Michelin car tyres have been shown to lead the way in environmental performance by offering longer life and reduced fuel consumption compared to their main European competitors, whilst maintaining the highest levels of safety on wet roads.

Two independent testing organisations, DEKRA and TÜV SÜD, conducted tests on Michelin’s 175/65 R 14T Energy Saver and 225/40 R 18Y Pilot Sport 3 car tyres and in each of these categories the Michelin tyres were up against their main European competitors from Bridgestone, Continental, Dunlop, Goodyear and Pirelli.

The results show that in each tyre category, Michelin came out on top by offering the best performance in terms of tyre life, rolling resistance and wet braking. As an example, compared to the average of the competitors’ results, the Michelin Energy Saver tyres offered around 19% longer tyre life, 17% better rolling resistance and a 7% improvement in wet braking performance. The Pilot Sport 3 was around 22%, 11% and 11% better than the average of the competitors, respectively (see separate sheets for results).

The tyre life tests were done by DEKRA and the rolling resistance and wet braking tests were done by TÜV SÜD. All tyres were bought from European tyre dealers to ensure they were exactly the same specification as those available to consumers on the replacement market.

The tyre life tests were carried out over 7,000 to 10,000 kms using two fleets of identical cars: Peugeot 206 plus for the 175/65 R 14s and VW Golf V for the 225/40 R 18s. Driving in four-car convoys, the tyres were switched between the cars and the cars’ position in the convoys was rotated to ensure the usage of all tyres was the same. Drivers were also switched between cars to ensure outside influences were reduced to the absolute minimum.

The rolling resistance tests were done using a rolling drum machine, which is approved by the European Commission, and in accordance with the latest ISO28580 specifications.

Taking into account longevity, fuel economy and safety, motorists can be sure that Michelin is still in pole position and leading its premium competitors in today’s highly competitive car tyre market.



The Kumho wouldnt even be in the same league as Bridgestone, Continental, Dunlop, Goodyear and Pirelli so i'd imagine the wear rate and wet weather braking could only be worse again.

Well we'll see wont we.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
I
Replies
8
Views
843