lil_coz
Registered User
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,641
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 38
DBXdarkangel must be singing and dancing now.
That made me chuckle! lol
25 second penalty......what they realised the 10 second penalty would still let him win!
What a bunch of biassed tools they really are!
After massa risking lives in the pit lane last week....un punished. Raikonen in Monacco spooning into the Force INdia.....- unpunished......! Raikonen's flying exhaust....unpunished....!>!>! Lewis hits him in the pits in canada.......punished!! Kovalinen today, stiks it up the inside and spins out webber---punished! I mean it is not like webber was out of the race like in monacco!
I remember when FIA had their tongues up Michael Shumachers ahole and he overtook under waved yellows (I think), anyway he got a 10 s stop and go penalty......they let him go in the pits on the last lap, cross the line, enter his pit and sit there 10 sec before declaring him the winner ***! If he had had to do the pit out at 60kmhs, he would have lost!
I wonder how long before Lewis realises they are out to get him and Mosely is a racist fxxk and stops bothering risking his *** like that. It seems you get a great car, cruise around in third like an also ran and get rewarded like Massa.
BTW, in 2007, Mosely got rid of the then chief Steward and appointed his own, some guy called allan donnely. Do a google search to see the history of this guy!!
Corruption at it's most cynical........at the expense of the fans without which there would be no sport and certainly no billion dollar business. Mclaren should pull their cars out and see how much joe smoe enjoys the Ferrari parade laps til the season end!
As a whole, I've got to say a pretty much agree with what you've said. It does seem like McLaren are at war with the FIA most of the time. Someting to do with Mosley and Ron Dennis having a tiff years ago. There are a few things that I'd point out from my view on what you've listed...
As far as Massa's incident in the pits, that was touch and go. He did file in behind at the end. Even Blundell said that in his view he shouldn't have been penalised. I suppose this will be debatable.
Kimi's incident at Monaco, I strongly disagree that he was let off. In my view it was a racing incident. Kimi lost control in the slippery conditions and hit Sutil in the rear. It wasn't done on purpose, it wasn't reckless driving. He lost control and couldn't avoid it. Now his flying exhaust on the other hand... something should have been done because that was ****** dangerous!
Lewis hitting Kimi in the pits I think was justified punishment. Because Lewis didnt see the red light at the end of the pits which was there for safety reasons, is why he got punished for it. Same goes for Rosberg too (I think it was him that followed Hamilton).
As for Heikki today, I didnt see the race so I cant comment. If Martin says that it was bad driving on Heikki's behalf, then maybe that was justified too?
I remember Schumachers 10's penalty. The one at Silverstone? I think that they found a loophole in the rules which 'technically' allowed them to do that. Because it fell into a technicallity, the FIA couldn't do squat which is why they amended the rules straight after. I must admit that Ferrari in those days were finding a lot of these 'grey areas' in the rules and were getting away with a lot. Right or wrong... it happens in motorsport.
They need to be more consistant with the punishments. Thats whats letting the sport down at the moment. In the past 2 years theres been some fantastic racing but its all clouded with last years Spygate and other little bits and pieces this year. The thing with F1 is that its a business nowadays. Not a sport so you'll get people pushing the rules to the limits and doing absolutly anything to win. At the end of the day winning means £££ and thats what its all about unfortunately.