I wonder if any of you knowledgeable chaps can answer a query in connection with the alternator.
The alternator is driven via a belt by the engine. Does an alternator take more engine power, and thus more fuel, to drive it when it's actually charging the battery as opposed to when the battery is already fully charged.
In a similar way the air-con compressor is driven, via a belt, by the engine but it has a electrically controlled clutch which only engages when output is required from the compressor. Obviously the compressor uses a little more engine power when the clutch is engaged than when it's not, but does the same apply to the clutch-less alternator.
My reason for asking is that the extra fuel used is often given as a reason for not introducing Daytime Running Lights but can an extra 42w make that much difference.
The alternator is driven via a belt by the engine. Does an alternator take more engine power, and thus more fuel, to drive it when it's actually charging the battery as opposed to when the battery is already fully charged.
In a similar way the air-con compressor is driven, via a belt, by the engine but it has a electrically controlled clutch which only engages when output is required from the compressor. Obviously the compressor uses a little more engine power when the clutch is engaged than when it's not, but does the same apply to the clutch-less alternator.
My reason for asking is that the extra fuel used is often given as a reason for not introducing Daytime Running Lights but can an extra 42w make that much difference.